It works smoothly and certain modifications that the camera made to the RAF file is also imported into Lightroom/Photoshop. Yes, it's part of my importing workflow into Lightroom (and/or photoshop). Does anyone have some sound advice for best processing of Fujifilm RAW files? Is converting to DNG a possible work around? In the past I have used SILKYPIX, but that was for my Nikon RAW files. I've used RawTherapee but I don't like the rendering of it. Because of the different type of sensor of the Fujifilm X camera's, there is a lot of talk to use different RAW processing software, because adobe doesn't play well with the RAF files. Having shot with Nikon for quite some years, my workflow has always revolved around adobe camera RAW and Photoshop. For my other camera, a GR II, the DNG RAW files work very well in all versions of LR/ACR.ĭoes anyone use the Adobe raw converter to convert their RAF files to DNG files for further processing? What are your experiences with that? Pros and cons? I use the X-T10 at the moment. It offers excellent detail rendering and advanced sharpening methods. I convert all of my RAF files in Iridient. Whichever way I go is going to be a huge learning curve for me, I have been so set in my ways with Aperture, if it were just the Fuji Files problem then I think I could cope with that, but Apple ending support for Aperture means I have to make the break sometime. I have been looking at Rawtherapee which is also free, seems many like it. Think I would feel much happier if I could do it in two steps rather than three or four. Wondering if maybe that for Fuji RAF files, then import into lightroom as Jpeg would work. a fourth software program in my PP workflow is more than I'd like. That said, I loved the rendering of Fuji's own RAW converter (freeware, just tried it), but still. I use PS, camera RAW and Bridge (+ sometimes PhotoMatix) and now have to use another program for the RAF files. I'd love to be able to use only the Adobe software. I use PS, camera RAW and Bridge (+ sometimes PhotoMatix) and now have to use another program for the RAF files. That said, I loved the rendering of Fuji's own RAW converter (freeware, just tried it), but still. Three programmes necessary for these files to get the best out of them, really really bothers me. Sorry to original OP for jumping in here, but I have just started a new thread in the Mac forum as I am about to finally leave Aperture and go to Lightroom CC and am worrying a little about RAF files from Fuji X Pro 2, which of course are not recognised at all in what remains of Aperture.įo foliage just use the freeware from Fuji whose UI is a bit odd but gives excellent resultsĪll in all if you are flexible in programs use, no issue at allįlexible and able. Pros : excellent for shadows and highlights recovery, one of the best, excellent work flow in both LR and PSĬons : a tendency to smear small details and to color bleeding This is really noticeable in some squbjects such trees bushes foliage, grass./ Unability to sharpen without artefacts creation One solution is to sharpen after raw conversion using the now freware Nik Sharpener Pro The ACR raw engine with RAF files have pros and cons The Adobe RAW concerter is the same in all Adobe applications
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |